He became interested in environmentalism in high school and is planning to major in environmental science and policy. Skip to main content. Toggle navigation. What's the Difference Between "Conservation" and "Preservation"? Why conservation? The world watched as the federal lands of the US were divided using a dual approach. This bought forward the most versatile system towards environmental conservation. For example, a Harvard publication written by Jihoon Kim highlights how beneficial it would be if conservation included the concept of preservation and worked together to refine the concept into a dual mechanism.
Meanwhile, Freya Mathews also argued that in order to sustain biodiversity , conservation has to partially adhere to preservationist concepts.
For example, if the two concepts are merged together, humans can potentially find ways to feed and accommodate everyone on the planet. At the same time, they can allow biodiversity to flourish at a favorable rate. Now, you understand how the conservation vs.
Meaning, you probably realize that both concepts are equally important to environmental protection. Here are some examples where you can see the practical implications of conservation and preservation to give you further insight. To apply the concept of conservation practically to a particular forest, you would need to control it. This means regulating the number of trees that grow and the wildlife that exists in the area. These decisions would depend on the resources that need to be harvested from the forest, along with the activities it would be reserved for.
These activities include game hunting, adventure sports, hiking, etc. However, while preserving the same forest, all you have to do is block the entire space off and leaving nature to take its course.
With minimal human intervention, the space will sustain itself while providing a natural getaway for nature enthusiasts. Both approaches aim to protect the forest and put it to ideal use for humans. But, the difference in the techniques they use to achieve the motive. Similarly, when it comes to conserving the environment, it can also be done on an everyday basis.
Humans can carry out simple actions like recycling and managing waste effectively. This means the resources we take from nature are put to optimal use. On the other hand, to preserve the environment, humans need to limit their use of the resources instead of using them as effectively as possible. The growing population would not allow eliminating natural resources entirely. Although, there are areas where natural resource harvesting is restricted partially to protect the environment. When it comes to protecting wildlife from human intervention, conservationists and preservationists use diverse approaches.
For example, protecting endangered species , restricting poaching and hunting to a sustainable level. Besides that, protecting natural habitats are conservationist practices as well.
Similarly, conservation can help improve sea life as well by promoting the partial prevention of coral bleaching and excessive fishing. Additionally, participating in beach-cleaning initiatives is also a way to conserve marine wildlife.
On the other hand, when it comes to wildlife preservation, it involves assigning several spaces for wildlife to thrive naturally. This approach is different from restoring endangered species with human effort. In contrast, preservation movements aim to let the animals and plants flourish without human disturbance. The most evident efforts of preservationists are preserving areas of tropical rainforests and major grasslands across the globe.
There are thousands of animal and plant species existing in tropical rainforests. Therefore, just restricting these spaces for their biological purpose is all we need to do to preserve them. Wrapping this conservation vs.
Each of the approaches introduced us to extraordinary measures that ultimately help in contributing positively to our planet. Conservation promotes the sustainable use and responsible management of natural wildlife habitats and resources.
Also, conservation promotes the effective use of these resources in enhancing the economic, cultural, and recreational aspects of human life. In contrast, preservation serves to maintain natural areas in their original condition. This addresses the concern of human encroachment on the environment to facilitate housing, farming, and tourism.
In a nutshell, the main difference between conservation vs preservation is that one advocates for humans.
While the other advocates entirely for nature. What does all of this mean? Our two biologists have different fundamental ideals as to how to protect Pisgah. This will allow native species to propagate and maintain their numbers as they would if the invasive pig was not present. The Preservationist disagrees with the Conservationist — he believes that Pisgah National Forest and its wildlife will be best protected by limiting habitat destruction in the area and not interfering with animals or plants in any way.
Limiting destruction could be done through multiple regulations and restrictions of the use of the land. By leaving flora and fauna in Pisgah National Forest alone as much as possible, nature will be able to continue its course with few human effects. The above example is a drastic oversimplification, but provides some insights into how different the modes of thought of Conservation and Preservation are.
0コメント